Peer Review of Digital Portfolio
For my peer review I marked Ashims' wiki. His wiki was very good in my opinion. He included everything that was supposed to be included (a thurogh reflection on each subject, pictures, examplkes etc). On his homepage he gave a very detailed explanation of who he was what he likes, what he dislikes etc. However he forgot to add what he disliked. He could also try improving his grammar and also try making it longer.
He personalized the wiki fairly well by changing font sizes, colours, the font itself and the background colour of the actual wiki. In order to improve he could hav echanged the wiki picture to something more appealing (a cartoon charecteer that reflects on his charecter, for example). He did well on following instructions and completeing the task; 9 reflections of different subjects was completed, he also added at least one picture to each of his subject's pages. Sometimes it was not very clear as to what exactly was his favourite task however apart from that he did very well on his reflections.
For his overall mark I gave him a 5/6, the only things that let him down was not including everything he was supposed to; two things he dislikes, changing the wiki image etc. If I were to mark him without using the rubric I would most likely have given him a 6, this is because from looking through his wiki the first time everything seems perfect, It is only the small details that let him get a 5. Overall the wiki was original, colourful and fun to read.
For my peer review I marked Ashims' wiki. His wiki was very good in my opinion. He included everything that was supposed to be included (a thurogh reflection on each subject, pictures, examplkes etc). On his homepage he gave a very detailed explanation of who he was what he likes, what he dislikes etc. However he forgot to add what he disliked. He could also try improving his grammar and also try making it longer.
He personalized the wiki fairly well by changing font sizes, colours, the font itself and the background colour of the actual wiki. In order to improve he could hav echanged the wiki picture to something more appealing (a cartoon charecteer that reflects on his charecter, for example). He did well on following instructions and completeing the task; 9 reflections of different subjects was completed, he also added at least one picture to each of his subject's pages. Sometimes it was not very clear as to what exactly was his favourite task however apart from that he did very well on his reflections.
For his overall mark I gave him a 5/6, the only things that let him down was not including everything he was supposed to; two things he dislikes, changing the wiki image etc. If I were to mark him without using the rubric I would most likely have given him a 6, this is because from looking through his wiki the first time everything seems perfect, It is only the small details that let him get a 5. Overall the wiki was original, colourful and fun to read.
